It started during an ordinary annual physical.
My doctor mentioned routine blood work, and somewhere in that unremarkable conversation, I asked whether we should add a PSA test. My dad had been diagnosed with prostate cancer, and it seemed sensible to check. He agreed without much thought. There was no pause, no shift in the room, nothing to suggest a door had just opened into a different version of my life. It was one more box checked on a lab order.
A few days later, the result came back. My PSA was around 8. Even without specialized training, I understood that a number like that in a man in his late thirties deserved attention. My doctor referred me to a urologist, and I had a biopsy.
It was negative.
I remember the relief distinctly — not the mild kind, but the full exhale that comes when you've been quietly bracing for bad news and get told you can stand down. Some men run high for reasons that have nothing to do with cancer, and I decided I was one of them. I wanted the story to be over, and the negative biopsy gave me permission to believe it was. Comfort is a persuasive attorney. Given enough time, it can build a case for almost anything.
For the next three years, I kept having blood work done, and my PSA kept climbing. It didn't jump — it crept, a little at a time, in the kind of small increments that are easy to explain away when you're emotionally invested in your original conclusion. My urologist never pushed hard for another biopsy, and that suited me fine. I'd found a doctor whose approach matched the version of events I preferred, and I was comfortable leaving it there.
As a veterinarian, I should have understood the danger of that better than most people. I know how trends work. I know what a negative test does and doesn't rule out. But doctors, veterinarians included, are often lousy patients. The truth was simpler than the reasoning I used to dress it up: I didn't want another biopsy, and I didn't want to find out what it might show.
Eventually the number reached 16, and the story I'd been telling myself for three years got too heavy to keep carrying. I switched urologists. The new one reviewed my history and told me plainly that we needed to repeat the biopsy. In May 2017, it came back positive.
The waiting ended in that moment. So did the negotiation. I didn't have language for it then, but that was the start of my education in radical acceptance — not as wisdom, but as the slow, unglamorous recognition that no amount of wishing or delaying was going to change what was already true.
Part of what made the diagnosis so hard to absorb was the timing. I was in one of the healthiest stretches of my adult life — active, eating well, doing what I was supposed to be doing. I felt strong. And I had cancer anyway.
I'd like to say I met that with grace. I didn't. I was angry, and I asked God why more times than I can count, without ever getting an answer that felt adequate. Worse, I caught myself resenting people who seemed to neglect their health entirely and appeared to move through life untouched by it. I'm not proud of that. But serious illness has a way of stripping the edited version off a person. It doesn't always show you your best self first. Sometimes what surfaces is fear, or envy, or the wounded part of you that still expects the world to explain itself.
There was a quieter discomfort too. Every time I sat in a urologist's waiting room, I was easily twenty or thirty years younger than everyone around me. I kept feeling like I'd wandered into the wrong chapter of my own life — arrived decades ahead of schedule, in a room meant for older men who'd already reached the age when these conversations were supposed to start.
I wasn't supposed to be there yet. But I was there. Reality doesn't check our timeline before it shows up.
After the diagnosis, I chose a prostatectomy. Getting to that decision involved its own share of hard conversations and sleepless nights, the kind of quiet weight that settles over a house when the future feels less dependable than it did a week earlier. Then the pathology came back aggressive enough that surgery alone wasn't going to cut it, and I went through more than thirty rounds of radiation, finishing in December 2017. Seven months from diagnosis to the end of active treatment. It's strange how fast you can move through something that changes you permanently.
The crisis chapter ended, but my relationship with cancer didn't. A urologist has remained part of my life ever since — checkups once or twice a year, conversations about side effects and medications, the long tail of a disease that people don't always picture when they describe cancer as a battle you win or lose in one clean moment. That language is tidy. The experience isn't.
I'm profoundly grateful my PSA has stayed undetectable since treatment. Every time I see that word on a lab result, I feel something close to reverence. But gratitude doesn't erase what the surgery and radiation took. I still live with physical and psychological effects, some visible and some private, and there are days my body reminds me what it went through, and days my mind does the same. Even now, the old anger occasionally resurfaces — less often, and with less force, but I still recognize its footsteps, usually when I'm exhausted or reminded of something the disease changed for good. I've stopped being shocked by its return. Acceptance isn't a certificate you earn once and hang on the wall. It's a decision you sometimes have to make again.
Somewhere along the way I came across the term itself, associated with psychologist Marsha Linehan and dialectical behavior therapy, though I'd already been stumbling toward the idea before I had a name for it. At first the phrase struck me as a little too polished, more suited to a poster than an oncology clinic. Over time, it became one of the most useful concepts I've encountered.
Radical acceptance isn't approval. It isn't pretending something doesn't hurt, or insisting everything happens for a reason. It isn't surrender or passivity. It's the decision to stop spending energy arguing with what's already true.
That distinction changed something in me. I'd spent years resisting reality — first through denial, then through anger — and neither one changed the diagnosis or restored what had been lost. Reality didn't soften because I resented it, and it didn't reverse because I could build a good case for why it was unfair. It simply remained. Once I stopped fighting the fact of it, I could actually respond to it: make decisions, ask better questions, have honest conversations instead of frightened, circular ones. The question slowly shifted from why is this happening to me to something more useful — from here, what's next. That question didn't make anything fair. It made movement possible.
This isn't only a cancer lesson. Maybe your version is a marriage that ended, a career that veered off the plan, a relationship with someone you love that never became what you hoped, or a dream you quietly let go of while everyone assumed you were fine. The specifics change. The resistance tends to look the same — replaying the evidence, arguing with the facts, revisiting the moment everything shifted as if enough analysis might still turn up a hidden exit.
Grief deserves room in all of this. Radical acceptance doesn't bypass it or turn pain into a self-improvement project. What it does is separate the hurt caused by what happened from the extra weight we add by insisting it shouldn't have happened at all. Cancer hurt. Treatment hurt. The lasting effects still do, some days. But I also caused myself real pain by treating reality like an opponent that might eventually give in if I stayed angry long enough. It never did. Acceptance gave the grief a container instead — a way to mourn what changed without spending every day demanding the past come back and renegotiate the terms.
I wouldn't choose any of this. I wouldn't choose the surgery, the radiation, the fear, or the long shadow that follows serious illness, and radical acceptance doesn't require me to call any of it a gift. What it's given me instead is a way to hold two things at once without needing them to cancel each other out — grateful for an undetectable PSA and still aware of what the treatment cost, glad to be healthy now and honest that the experience was, in places, brutal.
That's the part of this practice people tend to leave out. It isn't a single moment of clarity after which everything gets easier. It's something you return to, especially on the days some part of you still wants a different answer. Life eventually hands all of us something we didn't ask for and can't undo. We're allowed to grieve it. We're allowed to be angry about it for a while. But at some point, if we want to keep moving, we have to stop asking reality to become something it isn't — and start asking, instead, what we're going to do with what's actually true.
Thanks for reading!
Subscribe to receive my weekly newsletter, alerts when new posts are available, and occasional updates from me.
Thank you for subscribing!
Have a great day!